Skip to main content
Log in

Prey Food Quality Affects Flagellate Ingestion Rates

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flagellate feeding efficiency appears to depend on morphological characteristics of prey such as cell size and motility, as well as on other characteristics such as digestibility and cell surface characteristics. Bacteria of varying morphological characteristics (cell size) and mineral nutrient characteristics or food quality (as determined by the C:N:P ratio) were obtained by growing Pseudomonas fluorescens in chemostats at four dilution rates (0.03, 0.06, 0.10, and 0.13 h−1) and three temperatures (14°C, 20°C, and 28°C). Cells of a given food quality were heat-killed and used to grow the flagellate Ochromonas danica. Ingestion and digestion rates were determined by using fluorescently labeled bacteria of the same food quality as the bacteria supporting growth. Ingestion rates were affected by both food quality and cell size. Cells of high food quality (low carbon:element ratio) were ingested at higher rates than cells of low food quality. Multiple regression analysis indicated that cell size also influenced ingestion rate but to a much lesser extent than did food quality. Digestion rates were not correlated with either food quality or cell size. Results suggest that flagellates may adjust feeding efficiency based on the quality of food items available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, A, Larsson, U, Haström, A (1986) Size-selective grazing by a microflagellate on pelagic bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 33: 51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azam, F, Fenchel, T, Field, JG, Gray, JS, Meyer-Reil, LA, Thingstad, F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10: 257–263

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beardsley, C, Pernthaler, J, Wosniok, W, Amann, R (2003) Are readily culturable bacteria in coastal North Sea water suppressed by selective grazing mortality? Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 2624–2630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloem, J, Ellenbroek, F, Bar-Gilissen, M, Cappenberg, TE (1989) Protozoan grazing and bacterial production in stratified Lake Vechten estimated with fluorescently labeled bacteria and by thymidine incorporation. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 1787–1795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boenigk, J, Arndt, H (2000) Particle handling during interception feeding by four species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol 47: 350–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boenigk, J, Arndt, H, Cleven, EJ (2001) The problematic nature of fluorescently labeled bacteria (FLB) in Spumella feeding experiments—an explanation by using video microscopy. Arch Hydrobiol 152: 329–338

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boenigk, J, Matz, C, Jürgens, K, Arndt, H (2001) Confusing selective feeding with differential digestion in bacterivorous nanoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol 48: 425–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boenigk, J, Matz, C, Jürgens, K, Arndt, H (2001) The influence of pre-culture conditions and food quality on the ingestion and digestion process of three species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates. Microb Ecol 42: 168–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boenigk, J, Matz, C, Jürgens, K, Arndt, H (2002) Food concentration-dependent regulation of food selectivity of interception—feeding bacterivorous nanoflagellates. Aquat Microb Ecol 27: 195–202

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borsheim, KY (1984) Clearance rates of bacteria-sized particles by freshwater ciliates measured with monodispersed fluorescent latex beads. Oecologia 63: 286–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bremer, H, Dennis, PP (1987) Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate. In: Neidhardt, FC (Ed.) Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, DC, pp 1527–1542

  12. Butler, NM, Suttle, CA, Neill, WE (1989) Discrimination by freshwater zooplankton between single algal cells differing in nutritional status. Oecologia 78: 368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cebrián, J, Duarte, CM (1994) The dependence of herbivory on growth rate in natural plant communities. Funct Ecol 8: 518–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cebrián, J, Williams, M, McClelland, J, Valiela, I (1998) The dependence of heterotrophic consumption and C accumulation on autotrophic nutrient content in ecosystems. Ecol Lett 1: 165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chrzanowski, TH, Šimek, K (1990) Prey-size selection by freshwater flagellated protozoa. Limnol Oceanogr 35: 1429–1436

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chrzanowski, TH, Kyle, M, Elser, JJ, Sterner, RW (1996) Element ratios and growth dynamics of bacteria in an oligotrophic Canadian shield lake. Aquat Microb Ecol 11: 119–125

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cottrell, MT, Kirchman, DL (2004) Single-cell analysis of bacterial growth cell size and community structure in the Delaware estuary. Aquat Microb Ecol 34: 139–149

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cowles, TJ, Olson, RJ, Chisholm, SW (1988) Food selection by copepods: discrimination on the basis of food quality. Mar Biol 100: 41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dolan, JR, Šimek, K (1998) Ingestion and digestion of an autotrophic picoplankter Synechococcus by a heterotrophic nanoflagellate Bodo saltans. Limnol Oceanogr 43: 1740–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elser, JJ, Sterner, RW, Gorokhova, E, Fagan, WF, Markow, TA, Cotner, JB, Harrison, JF, Hobbie, SE, Odell, GM, Weider, LJ (2000) Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol Lett 3: 540–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elser, JJ, Acharya, K, Kyle, M, Cotner, J, Makino, W, Markow, TA, Watts, T, Hobbie, S, Fagan, WF, Schade, J, Hood, J, Sterner, RW (2003) Growth rate—stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6: 936–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonźalez, JM, Iriberri, J, Egea, L, Barcina, I (1990) Differential rates of digestion of bacteria by freshwater and marine phagotrophic protozoa. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 1851–1857

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gonźalez, JM, Sherr, E, Sherr, B (1993) Differential feeding by marine flagellates on growing versus starving and on motile versus non-motile bacterial prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102: 257–267

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grover, JP (2003) The impact of variable stoichiometry on predator–prey interactions: a multinutrient approach. Am Nat 162: 29–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Güsewell, S (2004) N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164: 243–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hahn, MW, Höfle, MG (1999) Flagellate predation on a bacterial model community: interplay of size-selective grazing specific bacterial cell size and bacterial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 4863–4872

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Herbert, D (1976) Stoichiometric aspects of microbial growth. In: Dean, ACR, Ellwood, DD, Evans, CGT, Melling, J (Eds.) Continuous Culture 6: Applications and New Fields. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holen, DA, Boraas, ME (1991) The feeding behavior of Spumella sp. as a function of particle size: implications for bacterial size in pelagic systems. Oecologia 220: 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jezbera, J, Horňák, K, Šimek, K (2005) Food selection by bacterivorous protests: insight from the analysis of the food vacuole content by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52: 351–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. John, EH, Davidson, K (2001) Prey selectivity and the influence of prey carbon:nitrogen ratio on microflagellate grazing. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 260: 93–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jürgens, K, DeMott, WR (1995) Behavioral flexibility in prey selection by bacterivorous nanoflagellates. Limnol Oceanogr 40: 1503–1507

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jürgens, K, Matz, C (2002) Predation as a shaping force for the phenotypic and genotypic composition of planktonic bacteria. Anton van Leeuwenhoek 81: 413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Keller, MD, Shapiro, L, Haugen, E, Cucci, TL, Sherr, E, Sherr, B (1994) Phagotrophy of fluorescently labeled bacteria by an oceanic phytoplankter. Microb Ecol 28: 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kiorboe, T, Titelman, J (1998) Feeding prey selection and prey encounter mechanism in the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Noctiluca scintillans. J Plankton Res 20: 1615–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Landry, MR, Lehner-Fournier, JM, Sundstrom, JA, Fagerness, VL, Selph, KE (1991) Discrimination between living and heat-killed prey by a marine zooflagellate Paraphysomonas vestita (Stokes). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 146: 139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matz, C, Jürgens, K (2001) Effects of hydrophobic and electrostatic cell surface properties of bacteria on feeding rates of heterotrophic nanoflagellates. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 814–820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Matz, C, Boenigk, J, Arndt, H, Jürgens, K (2002) Role of bacterial phenotypic traits in selective feeding of the heterotrophic nanoflagellates Spumella sp. Aquat Microb Ecol 27: 137–148

    Google Scholar 

  38. Matz, C, Deines, P, Jürgens, K (2002) Phenotypic variation in Pseudomonas sp. CM10 determines microcolony formation and survival under protozoan grazing. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 39: 57–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Matz, C, Jürgens, K (2003) Interaction of nutrient limitation and protozoan grazing determines the phenotypic structure of a bacterial community. Microb Ecol 45: 384–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. MacArthur, RH, Pianka, ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100: 603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McNaughton, SJ (1990) Mineral nutrition and seasonal movements of African migratory ungulates. Nature 345: 613–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Monger, BC, Landry, MR (1992) Size-selective grazing by heterotrophic nanoflagellates: an analysis using live-stained bacteria and dual-beam flow cytometry. Arch Hydrobiol Beih 37: 173–185

    Google Scholar 

  43. Monger, BC, Landry, MR, Brown, SL (1999) Feeding selection of heterotrophic marine nanoflagellates based on the surface hydrophobicity of their picoplankton prey. Limnol Oceanogr 44: 1917–1927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nisbet, B (1987) Nutrition and Feeding Strategies in Protozoa. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nygaard, K, Hessen, DO (1990) Use of 14C-protein-labeled bacteria for estimating clearance rates by heterotrophic and mixotrophic flagellates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 68: 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pernthaler, J, Sattler, B, Šimek, K, Schwarzenbacher, A, Psenner, R (1996) Top–down effects on the size-biomass distribution of a freshwater bacterioplankton community. Aquat Microb Ecol 10: 255–263

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pernthaler, J, Posch, T, Šimek, K, Vrba, J, Amann, R, Psenner, R (1997) Contrasting bacterial strategies to coexist with a flagellate predator in an experimental microbial assemblage. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 596–601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Peters, F, Marrase, C, Havskum, H, Rassoulzadegan, F, Dolan, J, Alcaraz, M, Gasol, JM (2002) Turbulence and the microbial food web: effects on bacterial losses to predation and on community structure. J Plankton Res 24: 321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pfandl, K, Posch, T, Boenigk, J (2004) Unexpected effects of prey dimensions and morphologies on the size selective feeding by two bacterivorous flagellates (Ochromonas sp. and Spumella sp.). J Eukaryot Microbiol 51: 626–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pomeroy, LR (1974) The ocean’s food web: A changing paradigm. BioScience 24: 499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Porter, KG, Feig, YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25: 943–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sanders, RW, Caron, D, Davidson, J, Dennett, M, Moran, D (2001) Nutrient acquisition and population growth of a mixotrophic alga in axenic and bacterized cultures. Microb Ecol 42: 513–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sanders, RW, Porter, KG, Caron, DA (1990) Relationship between phototrophy and phagotrophy in the mixotrophic chrysophyte Poterioochromonas malhamensis. Microb Ecol 19: 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Schaechter, E, Maaloe, O, Kjeldgaard, N (1958) Dependence on medium and temperature of cell size and chemical composition during balance growth of Salmonella typhimurium. J Gen Microbiol 19: 592–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Sherr, EB, Sherr, BF (2002) Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs. Anton van Leeuwenhoek 81: 293–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sherr, BF, Sherr, EB, McDaniel, J (1992) Effect of protistan grazing on the frequency of dividing cells in bacterioplankton assemblages. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 2381–2385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sherr, BF, Sherr, EB, Fallon, RD (1987) Use of monodispersed fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan Bacterivory. Appl Environ Microbiol 53: 958–965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sieracki, ME, Haas, LW, Caron, DA, Lessard, EJ (1987) Effect of fixation on particle retention by microflagellates: underestimation of grazing rates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 38: 251–258

    Google Scholar 

  59. Šimek, K, Vrba, J, Pernthaler, J, Posch, T, Hartman, P, Nedoma, J, Psenner, R (1997) Morphological and compositional shifts in an experimental bacterial community influenced by protists with contrasting feeding modes. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 587–5955

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Šimek, K, Macek, M, Seda, J, Vyhnalek, V (1990) Possible food chain relationships between bacterioplankton, protozoan, and cladocerans in a reservoir. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 75: 583–596

    Google Scholar 

  61. Starr, RC (1978) The culture collection of algae at the University of Texas at Austin. J Phycol 14: 47–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sterner, RW, Smith, RF (1993) Daphnia growth on varying quality of Scenedesmus: mineral limitation of zooplankton. Ecol 74: 2351–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Strickland, JDH, Parsons, TR (1972) A practical handbook of seawater analysis, 2nd ed. Bull Fish Res Board Can 167: 1–310

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tempest, D, Hunter, J (1965) The influence of temperature and pH value on the macromolecular composition of magnesium-limited and glycerol-limited Aerobacter aerogenes growing in a chemostat. J Gen Microbiol 41: 267–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. White, D, Hegeman, GD (1998) Microbial Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory: A Quantitative Approach. Oxford Univ. Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wilhelm, RO, Heller, M, Bohland, C, Tomaschewski, I, Klein, P, Klauth, W, Tappe, J, Groeneweg, C, Soeder, J, Janse, P, Meyer, W (1998) Biometric analysis of physiologically structured pure bacterial cultures recovering from starvation. Can J Microbiol 44: 399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wu, Q, Boenigk, J, Hahn, M (2004) Successful predation of filamentous bacteria by a nanoflagellate challenges current models of flagellate bacterivory. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 332–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Zubkov, MV, Sleigh, MA (1995) Bacterivory by starved marine heterotrophic nanoflagellates of two species which feed differently, estimated by uptake of dual radioactive-labeled bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 17: 57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zubkov, MV, Zöllner, E, Jürgens, K (2001) Digestion of bacterial macromolecules by a mixotrophic flagellate Ochromonas sp. compared with that by two heterotrophic flagellates Spumella pudica and Bodo saltans. Eur J Protistol 37: 155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zwart, KB, Darbyshire, JF (1992) Growth and nitrogenous excretion of a common soil flagellate Spumella sp.—a laboratory experiment. J Soil Sci 43: 145–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Texas Advanced Research Program grant 003656-0153-2001 and by National Science Foundation grant DEB-0444844. Special thanks to Marnie Rout, Natalie Hanna and Guimel Molina for assistance with analytical work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas H. Chrzanowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shannon, S.P., Chrzanowski, T.H. & Grover, J.P. Prey Food Quality Affects Flagellate Ingestion Rates. Microb Ecol 53, 66–73 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9140-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9140-y

Keywords

Navigation